kb.pub

📖 READER VIEW (Read-Only, Public Access)

Dispute Over Security Deposit Deductions

Öffentliche SitzungSitzung #35213.1.2026👁️ 37 AufrufeRental & Tenant Issues
🤖

AI Analysis Summary

A tenant is disputing security deposit deductions for cleaning and minor repairs, claiming the property was left in good condition.

Gemeldetes Problem

The tenant has moved out and is disputing the deductions I've made from their security deposit for cleaning and minor repairs. They believe the property was left in good condition.

Fragen

5 Fragen
Q1

Do you have move-in and move-out inspection reports with photos or videos documenting the property's condition? (ID: 1884)

Yes, I have both. I conducted a detailed move-in inspection with the tenant present, and we both signed a report documenting the condition of the property. I have photos of the apartment at move-in, showing it was in excellent condition. Similarly, I have a comprehensive move-out inspection report, also signed by the tenant, which notes the areas that required attention. I also took extensive photos and a video walkthrough of the property immediately after the tenant vacated, clearly showing the scuff marks on the wall, the chipped tile, and the general state of cleanliness (or lack thereof in certain areas) before the professional cleaning and repairs were done.

Q2

What specific items were deducted from the security deposit, and what were the estimated costs for each? (ID: 1885)

The specific items deducted are: 1. Professional Cleaning: $250. This covered a deep clean of the entire apartment, including oven, refrigerator, bathrooms, and floors. 2. Wall Repair (Living Room): $120. This was for patching and repainting a section of the living room wall where there were significant scuff marks and a small dent. 3. Bathroom Tile Repair: $80. This covered the cost of replacing a single chipped tile in the shower and re-grouting the surrounding area. These were estimates based on quotes from the service providers.

Q3

What is the tenant's specific argument for disputing each deduction? (ID: 1886)

The tenant claims the apartment was 'spotless' and that the deductions are 'unreasonable.' Regarding the cleaning, they stated they 'did a good job' themselves and that hiring a professional was unnecessary. For the minor repairs, they argue that the scuff marks on the wall were 'already there' when they moved in, and the chipped tile in the bathroom was 'just a small chip' that wouldn't have bothered anyone. They also mentioned that they 'didn't break anything' and that the deductions are an attempt to unfairly keep their deposit.

Q4

What is your lease agreement's clause regarding cleaning and minor repairs upon move-out? (ID: 1887)

Our lease agreement, specifically section 7b, states that the tenant is responsible for returning the property in the same condition as it was at the commencement of the lease, 'normal wear and tear excepted.' This includes a thorough cleaning of all rooms, appliances, and fixtures, as well as the cost of any repairs needed due to damage beyond normal wear and tear. It explicitly mentions that the tenant will be charged for professional cleaning if the property is not left in a satisfactory state.

Q5

Have you provided the tenant with an itemized list of deductions and supporting documentation (e.g., receipts for repairs)? (ID: 1888)

Yes, I provided the tenant with an itemized list of deductions within the legally required timeframe. For the cleaning, I included a bill from the professional cleaning service I hired. For the minor repairs, I have receipts from the handyman who performed the work, detailing the parts and labor. I also included before-and-after photos of the areas that required repair.

Identified Causes

4 Ursachen
#1

Disagreement on 'Normal Wear and Tear' vs. Damage

75%

The tenant may consider the condition of the property as normal wear and tear, while the landlord views it as damage requiring repair or deep cleaning beyond standard turnover.

#2

Insufficient Documentation of Condition

60%

Without clear, dated evidence of the property's condition at move-in and move-out, it's difficult to substantiate the deductions.

#3

Unreasonable or Unsubstantiated Deductions

50%

The landlord may have charged for services or repairs that were not necessary, were overpriced, or lack proper receipts or invoices.

#4

Miscommunication or Lack of Clear Expectations

40%

The tenant may not have fully understood their cleaning and repair obligations upon move-out, leading to a discrepancy in expectations.

Recommended Solutions

8 Lösungen
💡

Gather All Evidence

100%Official
Collect all available photos, videos, inspection reports, and communication records related to the property's condition.

🤖 AI Analysis

"The user has explicitly stated they have comprehensive move-in and move-out documentation, including signed reports and photos/videos. This solution directly addresses the core of the dispute by enabling a direct comparison of the property's condition before and after the tenant's occupancy, which is crucial for validating deductions."

💡

Consult Lease Agreement

95%Official
Refer to the lease agreement's definitions of 'normal wear and tear' and tenant responsibilities for cleaning and repairs.

🤖 AI Analysis

"The user has provided details about their lease agreement's clause regarding 'normal wear and tear' and tenant responsibilities. This solution is highly relevant as it allows for a direct comparison between the lease terms and the tenant's claims, helping to determine if the deductions fall within the agreed-upon responsibilities."

💡

Provide Itemized Receipts

90%Official
Ensure all deductions are supported by detailed invoices or receipts from service providers.

🤖 AI Analysis

"The user has confirmed they provided an itemized list with supporting documentation, including bills and receipts. This solution reinforces the importance of having and presenting this documentation, which is a key component in substantiating the deductions."

💡

Re-evaluate Charges

85%Official
Review the necessity and cost of each deduction to ensure they are fair and reasonable according to local landlord-tenant laws.

🤖 AI Analysis

"The tenant is disputing the reasonableness of the charges. This solution is relevant because it prompts a review of the necessity and cost of each deduction, ensuring they align with local laws and are not excessive, which is a common point of contention in security deposit disputes."

💡

Review Move-In/Move-Out Documentation

80%Official
Compare the move-in condition report and photos/videos with the move-out condition to objectively assess the changes.

🤖 AI Analysis

"This solution is closely related to [1948] but focuses specifically on the comparison aspect. Given the user has both move-in and move-out documentation, this solution is highly relevant for objectively assessing the changes and justifying the deductions."

💡

Review Move-Out Instructions

70%Official
Check if clear move-out instructions, including cleaning standards, were provided to the tenant.

🤖 AI Analysis

"While the user hasn't explicitly mentioned providing move-out instructions, it's a good practice to verify. If the instructions were unclear, it could weaken the landlord's position. However, the user has provided strong evidence for their deductions, making this slightly less critical than evidence-based solutions."

💡

Engage in Open Communication

65%Official
Attempt to discuss the tenant's concerns directly and explain the basis for the deductions, referencing documentation.

🤖 AI Analysis

"The user has already provided detailed documentation. While open communication is always good, the primary issue here is the tenant's disagreement with the validity of the deductions, which is best addressed by presenting and reinforcing the existing evidence. This solution is more about the process of resolving the dispute rather than the core evidence."

💡

Seek Third-Party Assessment (if applicable)

40%Official
If the dispute escalates, consider a neutral third-party inspection to provide an objective assessment of the property's condition.

🤖 AI Analysis

"This solution is for when the dispute escalates. Currently, the user is seeking guidance on how to handle the dispute based on the information provided. A third-party assessment is a later step if direct resolution fails."

Anderen helfen