📖 READER VIEW (Read-Only, Public Access)
The appraisal value is significantly lower than the agreed-upon offer price, and the buyer cannot cover the difference, jeopardizing the deal and their earnest money deposit.
Our offer price was $450,000, and the appraised value came in at $420,000. This means there's a difference of $30,000 between what we agreed to pay and what the lender is willing to finance based on the appraisal. Since our lender will only finance 80% of the appraised value, they are willing to lend us $336,000 ($420,000 * 0.80). We had planned to put down 20% of the offer price, which would have been $90,000, bringing our total to $426,000. Now, with the lower appraisal, we'd need to come up with an additional $14,000 in cash to cover the difference between our original down payment and the new required down payment based on the appraisal ($420,000 * 0.20 = $84,000, so our original $90,000 down payment is actually more than enough for the down payment portion, but the loan amount is the issue). The real problem is that the loan amount they are offering ($336,000) plus our original down payment ($90,000) only gets us to $426,000, leaving us $24,000 short of our $450,000 offer price. We don't have that extra $24,000 readily available.
The lender requires a Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio of no more than 80% for this particular conventional loan. This means the loan amount cannot exceed 80% of the appraised value. Since the appraisal came in lower, our loan amount is now being calculated based on that lower figure, which is creating the shortfall.
We've looked through the appraisal report, and it's quite detailed. The appraiser did mention a few comparable sales (comps) that were used. One of them was a house that sold about six months ago, which seems a bit dated given the current market. Another comp was a house that had some significant renovations, which ours doesn't have. We're wondering if the appraiser adequately accounted for the condition of our property versus the comps, or if they missed any recent sales in the immediate neighborhood that might have been higher. We're considering asking our agent to reach out to the appraiser to clarify some of their reasoning, but we're not sure how much information they'll be willing to share.
The deadline for our financing contingency is actually quite soon, unfortunately. It's set for next Friday, which gives us less than a week to figure this out. The closing date itself is about three weeks after that, so if we can't resolve the financing gap, we'll likely have to terminate the contract before the contingency expires to get our earnest money back.
Yes, we've spoken with our loan officer extensively. They've been pretty firm. They explained that due to our specific loan program (a conventional loan with a certain down payment percentage), they can only lend up to 80% of the *appraised value*, not the purchase price. They said there's no flexibility on this, and they can't just 'stretch' the loan. We asked if we could bring more cash to closing to make up the difference, but the issue is that the loan itself is based on the lower appraisal, so even if we put more cash down, the loan amount they're willing to give us is capped by the appraisal. They also mentioned that reappraisal is an option, but it's costly and there's no guarantee it will come in higher, and we'd have to pay for it ourselves.
Der Angebotspreis wurde im Verhältnis zu den aktuellen Marktbedingungen oder dem tatsächlichen Zustand der Immobilie zu hoch angesetzt, was zu einer Bewertung führte, die eine realistischere Einschätzung widerspiegelt.
Der Kreditgeber hat eine strenge Anforderung an das Verhältnis von Darlehen zu Wert (Loan-to-Value, LTV), die mit dem aktuellen Schätzwert und der verfügbaren Anzahlung des Käufers nicht erfüllt werden kann.
Die Bewertung kann Fehler enthalten, wie z. B. falsche vergleichbare Verkäufe (Comps), Fehlberechnungen oder das Übersehen wichtiger Immobilieneigenschaften, was zu einer künstlich niedrigen Bewertung führt.
Der lokale Immobilienmarkt hat möglicherweise eine jüngste Flaute erlebt, oder die Immobilie selbst weist erhebliche Mängel auf, die während des Angebotsverfahrens nicht vollständig berücksichtigt wurden, was zu einer niedrigeren Bewertung führt.
🤖 AI Analysis
"The user's primary problem is the appraisal gap and the lender's inability to finance it. Renegotiating the purchase price with the seller to match the appraised value directly addresses this core issue. The user has already reviewed the appraisal and has concerns about the comps used, which provides a basis for such a negotiation."
🤖 AI Analysis
"Asking the seller for concessions (like a credit) is a direct way to offset the appraisal gap without requiring the buyer to come up with more cash or renegotiating the price down. This is highly relevant as the user explicitly states they don't have the extra $24,000 readily available."
🤖 AI Analysis
"The user has already expressed concerns about the appraisal report, specifically mentioning dated comps and potential misrepresentation of their property's condition compared to renovated comps. Requesting a reconsideration of value from the appraiser, especially if the buyer's agent can highlight these points, is a logical next step to try and increase the appraised value."
🤖 AI Analysis
"Given the user's concerns about the appraisal's methodology (dated comps, comparison to renovated properties), ordering a second appraisal from a different appraiser is a strong option. This provides an independent valuation and could potentially yield a higher appraisal, resolving the financing issue. The user's agent is already considering reaching out to the current appraiser, which indicates an openness to challenging the appraisal."
🤖 AI Analysis
"While the user hasn't explicitly mentioned property issues, their concern about the appraisal not adequately accounting for their property's condition versus renovated comps suggests there might be grounds to renegotiate based on condition. If the appraisal report implies the property is in worse condition than the comps, this could be used as leverage."
🤖 AI Analysis
"The user states they don't have the extra $24,000 readily available. However, if they *could* find a way to increase their down payment (even if it's difficult), it would directly reduce the loan amount needed and potentially bridge the gap. This is a less ideal solution given their stated financial limitation but remains a possibility."
🤖 AI Analysis
"The user explicitly states they don't have the extra $24,000 readily available. Seeking additional financing (personal loan, HELOC, family) is a way to acquire those funds. While not ideal, it's a direct solution to the cash shortfall if other options fail."
🤖 AI Analysis
"The user's lender is firm due to their specific loan program and LTV requirements. While exploring other lenders is generally good advice, the user's current lender's policy seems tied to the loan program itself (conventional with a certain down payment percentage), making it less likely that another lender with the same loan program would have significantly different LTV rules based on appraisal value. However, a different lender might have different appraisal review processes or loan products."
🤖 AI Analysis
"While re-evaluating deal feasibility is always important, the user is actively seeking solutions to *save* the deal, not necessarily to walk away. They are under a tight deadline and are exploring options to bridge the gap. This solution is more of a last resort or a parallel consideration rather than an immediate action plan to resolve the financing issue."
Apr 12, 2024 ... ... appraisal for lower-risk transactions, such as a low loan-to-value (LTV) ratio loan. Refinance loans: Lenders may order desktop appraisals ...
Oct 24, 2023 ... Lenders require the appraisal to ensure they're not loaning the buyer more money than the value of the home. So if the appraisal comes in lower ...
Nov 12, 2021 ... In its most basic form, an appraisal is an expert assessment and estimate of the value of a particular property. Lenders need to know that ...